News6 min read

Mastercard's New Chargeback Rules: What Changed in 2025

By ProofReturn Team2025-01-10

Mastercard updated response timeframes based on transaction type. Digital goods now have 30-day deadlines, while physical goods get 45 days.

📋 Key Changes in This Guide:

New transaction-type based deadlines (30 vs 45 days)
How Mastercard classifies your business
Evidence requirements by product type
Updated reason code requirements

Mastercard's Transaction-Type Based Deadlines

While Visa reduced their response window across the board, Mastercard took a different approach in 2025: they created separate timelines based on whether goods are digital or physical.

New Mastercard Response Timeframes:

  • Digital goods/services: 30 calendar days
  • Physical goods: 45 calendar days
  • Mixed transactions: 30 days (defaults to shorter window)

Why Different Deadlines for Different Products?

Mastercard's reasoning is that digital goods disputes require different evidence types. Physical goods need shipping documentation, which takes time to obtain from carriers. Digital goods have instant delivery proof through download logs and access records.

However, this creates complexity for merchants who sell both physical and digital products, or hybrid offerings like subscription boxes with digital content.

How Mastercard Classifies Your Transaction

The classification is determined by your Merchant Category Code (MCC) and transaction details. Here's how common business types are categorized:

💻
Digital Goods
30-day deadline
📦
Physical Goods
45-day deadline
⚠️
Hybrid Cases
Defaults to 30 days
• Software subscriptions (SaaS)• E-commerce shipped products• SaaS + Hardware bundle
• Digital downloads (ebooks, music)• Subscription boxes (physical)• Consulting + deliverables
• Online courses & education• Print-on-demand products• Digital + physical subscriptions
• Virtual goods (in-game items)• Retail merchandise↓ When in doubt
• Streaming subscriptions• Consumer electronicsAssume 30-day window
• Web hosting & domains

Pro Tip: When in doubt, assume the shorter 30-day window applies. It's better to respond early than risk missing the deadline.

Evidence Requirements by Product Type

💻

Digital Goods

30-day deadline

Since you can't provide tracking numbers, focus on:

  • Access logs: IP addresses, login timestamps, duration of use
  • Download records: What was downloaded, when, from which IP
  • Feature usage: Which features the customer used and how often
  • Account history: Previous successful transactions, saved preferences
  • Email confirmations: Welcome emails, renewal notices, receipts
→ SaaS chargeback guide
📦

Physical Goods

45-day deadline

Traditional evidence still applies:

  • Tracking information: Carrier tracking showing "delivered" status
  • Delivery proof: Signature confirmation if available
  • Shipping address: Confirmation it matches billing or verified address
  • Product description: What customer saw at purchase time
  • Photos/documentation: Pictures of item as shipped
→ E-commerce chargeback guide

Updated Mastercard Reason Codes

Mastercard also refined several reason codes in 2025:

Impact on Multi-Product Merchants

If you sell both physical and digital products, you need to:

1. Track Transaction Types
Know which of your products are classified as digital vs physical. This affects how you organize evidence.

2. Maintain Separate Evidence Files
Physical goods need tracking info, digital goods need usage logs. Don't mix up evidence types or you'll confuse reviewers.

3. Assume Shorter Deadlines for Hybrid Sales
If a customer buys both a physical product and digital download in one transaction, Mastercard defaults to the 30-day digital goods window.

Comparison with Other Networks

Mastercard's 2025 approach is more generous than Visa's new 9-day window but more complex:

Response Timeline Comparison:

  • Visa: 9 days (US/Canada) - All products
  • Mastercard: 30 days (digital) / 45 days (physical)
  • Amex: 20 days - All products
  • Discover: 20 days - All products

Mastercard's approach is more forgiving than Visa's but requires merchants to understand how their products are classified.

5 Best Practices for Mastercard Disputes in 2025

1

Verify Your Product Classification

Contact Mastercard or your payment processor to confirm how your goods are categorized. Don't guess - wrong classification means wrong deadline.

Action: Ask your processor: "Are my transactions classified as digital goods (30 days) or physical goods (45 days)?"

2

Organize Evidence by Product Type

Keep digital evidence (logs, screenshots) separate from physical evidence (tracking, photos). Mixing evidence types confuses reviewers and weakens your case.

Tip: Create separate folders: "Digital Evidence" and "Physical Evidence" - only submit the relevant one.

3

Don't Wait the Full 30 or 45 Days

Respond as quickly as possible. Early responses show good faith and give you buffer time if something goes wrong with your submission.

Target: Submit within 7-10 days of receiving the dispute notification, regardless of your deadline.

4

Use Reason Code-Specific Evidence

Each Mastercard reason code has different evidence requirements. Generic responses lose.

Example: 4837 (fraud) needs authorization proof, while 4853 (not provided) needs delivery proof.

5

Document Everything From Day One

Save all transaction records, communications, and delivery proof immediately. Don't wait for disputes to start collecting evidence.

Automate: Set up automatic exports of order data, shipping info, and customer emails weekly.

Ready to Fight Your Mastercard Chargeback?

ProofReturn generates Mastercard-compliant dispute packets in minutes. Our system automatically formats evidence based on your product type and reason code.

Digital & physical formats
All Mastercard reason codes
30 or 45 day support
Create Mastercard Response →

$29 per dispute • Instant delivery • Money-back guarantee

Need Help with Your Chargeback?

Generate a professional, bank-ready dispute packet in minutes with our automated tool. Includes all required evidence templates and processor-specific guidelines.